|
High Court Overrules State Anti-Gambling Law Wednesday 2nd April 2008 The Rev Fred Nile, Leader of the Christian Democratic Party, has raised concern that a loophole in the Commonwealth Constitution has enabled a Gambling Exchange to successfully challenge a State Government in the Australian High Court, overturning anti-gambling legislation it had enacted to protect it’s citizens. The Tasmanian branch of the UK owned internet gambling exchange, Betfair, took the Western Australian Government to court last week arguing that gambling was a domestic trade and therefore can not be prohibited by any State Legislature under section 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution. “Since when did we regard gambling a legitimate trade? This was not the intent of our Constitution. Aside from the significant social costs of gambling in our society, these gambling exchanges enable bets to be placed on the worst performing entities, thus opening the door to all sorts of corruption”, stated Rev Fred Nile. “I hold grave fears not only with regard to gambling throughout the nation, but for the very sovereignty of our States. What other State protections will be circumvented via the same mechanism?” Rev Fred Nile also raised the issue in State Parliament yesterday: Reverend the Hon. Fred Nile: I direct my question to the Minister for Primary Industries, representing the Minister for Racing and Gaming.
The Hon. Ian MacDonald: I have a detailed understanding of the issues the member has raised, but I will refer the question to the Minister responsible and get a reply. It is difficult to review a High Court decision; I am not sure there is a review process. It was a declaratory statement, but I will obtain a reply for the member. |